<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Existence of colours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/</link>
	<description>Two things fill the mind with ever-increasing wonder and awe, the more often and steadily we reflect upon them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me. - Immanuel Kant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pochp</title>
		<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>pochp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I forgot to add I understand you Lee. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to add I understand you Lee. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pochp</title>
		<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>pochp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure yet if this will help. I found it from Wikipedia:

Goethe from Steiner, 
“The colours therefore, to begin with, make their appearance purely and simply as phenomena at the border between light and dark…”
Colours arise at the borders, where light and dark flow together.”
Click here for a visual representation.
Goethe seems to have thought of light and dark in terms of a metaphysical dualism, from whose interaction color is born. 
Newton held that white light passing through a prism is diffused into its various wavelengths.  He also may have steered the discussion into wave-particle duality.
See Also: Wikipedia’s article, Physics Today article on his experiments, Goethe’s color triangle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure yet if this will help. I found it from Wikipedia:</p>
<p>Goethe from Steiner,<br />
“The colours therefore, to begin with, make their appearance purely and simply as phenomena at the border between light and dark…”<br />
Colours arise at the borders, where light and dark flow together.”<br />
Click here for a visual representation.<br />
Goethe seems to have thought of light and dark in terms of a metaphysical dualism, from whose interaction color is born.<br />
Newton held that white light passing through a prism is diffused into its various wavelengths.  He also may have steered the discussion into wave-particle duality.<br />
See Also: Wikipedia’s article, Physics Today article on his experiments, Goethe’s color triangle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Young, 李阳</title>
		<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Young, 李阳</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Regarding to pochp&#039;s quote,

Well, our brains (or us) don&#039;t really proves the existence of visible light waves. Our brains only cope with that particular wavelengths of electromagnetic waves because, as I&#039;ve mentioned, it is vital for survival. How can we say that &quot;red&#039; is visible when insects can&#039;t perceive it? If we don&#039;t need to perceive light rays to survive, then there will not be a &quot;visible light&quot; spectrum in the midst of the EM spectrum. Actually, visible light waves is just a representation of the environment that we happen to live in. For instance, insects&#039; &quot;visible light waves&quot; extends up to Ultraviolet waves- that&#039;s because their niche deals with Ultraviolet light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding to pochp&#8217;s quote,</p>
<p>Well, our brains (or us) don&#8217;t really proves the existence of visible light waves. Our brains only cope with that particular wavelengths of electromagnetic waves because, as I&#8217;ve mentioned, it is vital for survival. How can we say that &#8220;red&#8217; is visible when insects can&#8217;t perceive it? If we don&#8217;t need to perceive light rays to survive, then there will not be a &#8220;visible light&#8221; spectrum in the midst of the EM spectrum. Actually, visible light waves is just a representation of the environment that we happen to live in. For instance, insects&#8217; &#8220;visible light waves&#8221; extends up to Ultraviolet waves- that&#8217;s because their niche deals with Ultraviolet light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Young, 李阳</title>
		<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Young, 李阳</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Yeah. But in this physical world, as we know, there&#039;s nothing such as colours- because it is a mere interpretation in our brain, a way we interprets and perceives the environment.

It is indeed true that our surroundings are nothing but atoms and energy- our brain makes it interesting- and more importantly, it is vital for survival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. But in this physical world, as we know, there&#8217;s nothing such as colours- because it is a mere interpretation in our brain, a way we interprets and perceives the environment.</p>
<p>It is indeed true that our surroundings are nothing but atoms and energy- our brain makes it interesting- and more importantly, it is vital for survival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pochp</title>
		<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>pochp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-33</guid>
		<description>&#039;However, colour is a way our brains proves the existence of visible light waves.&#039;
Point for you Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;However, colour is a way our brains proves the existence of visible light waves.&#8217;<br />
Point for you Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-32</guid>
		<description>After some thought, it still boils down to how you define &quot;existence&quot;.

Actually I did not say that something unproven is true because of the existence of the word. Who would make sure a hilarious statement? Haha.

I was just trying to say that there are different ways of interpreting various &quot;information&quot;.

There is no doubt that all the senses we &#039;feel&#039; are in the mind. However, colour is a way our brains proves the existence of visible light waves.

Just like X-rays, it may not be visible to us, but the usage of a X-ray machine to produce X-ray images is to prove the existence of X-rays. But the X-ray images do exist.

Well of course, there won&#039;t be a X-ray image unless we use or senses to perceive it because in actual fact, it is just a gigantic combination of atoms.

Yes, if we do not have a mind, our surroundings are nothing but atoms, molecules, forces and energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After some thought, it still boils down to how you define &#8220;existence&#8221;.</p>
<p>Actually I did not say that something unproven is true because of the existence of the word. Who would make sure a hilarious statement? Haha.</p>
<p>I was just trying to say that there are different ways of interpreting various &#8220;information&#8221;.</p>
<p>There is no doubt that all the senses we &#8216;feel&#8217; are in the mind. However, colour is a way our brains proves the existence of visible light waves.</p>
<p>Just like X-rays, it may not be visible to us, but the usage of a X-ray machine to produce X-ray images is to prove the existence of X-rays. But the X-ray images do exist.</p>
<p>Well of course, there won&#8217;t be a X-ray image unless we use or senses to perceive it because in actual fact, it is just a gigantic combination of atoms.</p>
<p>Yes, if we do not have a mind, our surroundings are nothing but atoms, molecules, forces and energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chee keong</title>
		<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>chee keong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-30</guid>
		<description>haha,funny.den god exist?haha,existence mean the state or fact of being real or living or of being present. haha,u noe god exist leh,how u prove dats?so can u prove existance of color using de method used to prove existance of god??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha,funny.den god exist?haha,existence mean the state or fact of being real or living or of being present. haha,u noe god exist leh,how u prove dats?so can u prove existance of color using de method used to prove existance of god??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young</title>
		<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Well we are arguing over the existence of colour in the real, physical world but not with the english language. Based on your argument, anything that is unproven must be true because the language exists in itself.

Does God exist simply because there&#039;s a word &quot;God&quot; in my Oxford English Dictionary? Well, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well we are arguing over the existence of colour in the real, physical world but not with the english language. Based on your argument, anything that is unproven must be true because the language exists in itself.</p>
<p>Does God exist simply because there&#8217;s a word &#8220;God&#8221; in my Oxford English Dictionary? Well, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pochp</title>
		<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>pochp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-28</guid>
		<description>You clarified something chee: color only exists in our minds. Doesn&#039;t that prove that everything only exists in our minds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You clarified something chee: color only exists in our minds. Doesn&#8217;t that prove that everything only exists in our minds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chee keong</title>
		<link>http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/existence-of-colours/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>chee keong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterhengjy.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-27</guid>
		<description>may be 1 day,u cant say &#039;color&#039; dunot exist(lyk wat u deny).De existence of any thing is not forever,must be changed with de time...my view is,red color 4 me do not exist 4 snake or other type of creature!de interpretion of de brain do not be de same in all creatures.Existance of &#039;color&#039;is dependant of de existant of sumthing dat can detect de stimuli of electrowaves.Yes, electomagnetic waves can exist in certain condition only,if in de black hole,they do not exist ,so color oso lyk dat.if we give sumthing a definition 4 its existance,shud we be universary?Yes,!So, u cant deny dat color do not exist !but , u can agree dat color &#039;exist&#039; in de mind,a virtual world!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>may be 1 day,u cant say &#8216;color&#8217; dunot exist(lyk wat u deny).De existence of any thing is not forever,must be changed with de time&#8230;my view is,red color 4 me do not exist 4 snake or other type of creature!de interpretion of de brain do not be de same in all creatures.Existance of &#8216;color&#8217;is dependant of de existant of sumthing dat can detect de stimuli of electrowaves.Yes, electomagnetic waves can exist in certain condition only,if in de black hole,they do not exist ,so color oso lyk dat.if we give sumthing a definition 4 its existance,shud we be universary?Yes,!So, u cant deny dat color do not exist !but , u can agree dat color &#8216;exist&#8217; in de mind,a virtual world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
